<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Online Reputation Management &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glenwoodfin.com</link>
	<description>Online Reputation Management, SEO and Personal Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.glenwoodfin.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Google Ranks the Word &#8216;Scam&#8217; High in SEO and Loses Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.glenwoodfin.com/reputation-management/google-ranks-the-word-scam-high-in-seo-and-loses-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.glenwoodfin.com/reputation-management/google-ranks-the-word-scam-high-in-seo-and-loses-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 05:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen Woodfin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google sued]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glenwoodfin.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve ever done any online reputation management (clearing the first page of a Google search for any negative listings for an individual or corporation), you&#8217;ve surely noticed that the Google algorithm artificially boosts words like scam, criminal, prison, jail and many negative words unfairly. Not only do they push words that promote slander in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left;  margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glenwoodfin.com%2Freputation-management%2Fgoogle-ranks-the-word-scam-high-in-seo-and-loses-lawsuit%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glenwoodfin.com%2Freputation-management%2Fgoogle-ranks-the-word-scam-high-in-seo-and-loses-lawsuit%2F&amp;source=glenwoodfin&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;service_api=9baa9432e09d5571799b2ae153bb6907&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>If you&#8217;ve ever done any <a title="Online Reputation Management" href="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/seo/online-reputation-management-top-tips-diy/" target="_blank">online reputation management</a> (clearing the first page of a Google search for any negative listings for an individual or corporation), you&#8217;ve surely noticed that the Google algorithm artificially boosts words like scam, criminal, prison, jail and many negative words unfairly. Not only do they push words that promote slander in their organic search, but it&#8217;s just as easy to see this synthetic promotion in their Google Instant Autosuggest feature where a drop down list of possible keyword searches are promoted to you as if they are trying to read your mind.</p>
<p>The fact that Google pushes defamatory words is so obvious that a <a href="http://www.bigmouthmedia.com/live/articles/google-scam-suggestion-condemned-by-high-court.asp/6680/" rel="nofollow">company in France won a lawsuit against Google for unfairly catapulting the French word for scam (arnaque) to the top of a Google Suggest search</a> for their company name.  In an article at <a title="Big Mouth Media" href="http://www.bigmouthmedia.com/live/articles/google-scam-suggestion-condemned-by-high-court.asp/6680/" rel="nofollow">BigMouthMedia.com</a> they open with this:</p>
<p>&#8220;A Paris court of appeal has ruled against <dfn title="An important spider-based search property">Google</dfn> in a defamation case lodged by the Centre National Privé de Formation a Distance (CNFDI) in a suit which claimed the search engine&#8217;s &#8216;Suggest&#8217; feature linked the organisation to the word &#8216;scam&#8217;.</p>
<p>The Mountain View giant has been ordered to take necessary measures to remove this suggestion from its search functions, according to French legal site Legalis.net.&#8221;</p>
<p>Given time, I could illustrate thousands of examples, but I wouldn&#8217;t do so because it would only perpetuate the evil practice against good businesses. I will share one because the company has been a punching bag for ridicule, yet has continued to thrive for over 50 years.  I refer to the Amway corporation. Personally, I think Amway has a lawsuit against Google just waiting to happen.</p>
<p>As of 5/28/2011, as one types into the Google search bar, the instant Google Autosuggest feature catapults the keyword phrase, &#8220;Amway Scam&#8221; in third place before you&#8217;ve even finished typing the word:  Amway. Yet their own Keyword Tool says that searches for these keywords have many more searches per month (all created with a broadmatch search for the keyword, &#8220;Amway&#8221;):</p>
<ul>
<li>Amway                              ( 1,830,000)  <a title="Amway Scam" href="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Amway-Keyword-Tool.jpg" target="_blank">Monthly Broadmatch Searches for &#8216;Amway&#8217;</a></li>
<li>Amway Global                (74,000)</li>
<li>www.amway.com          (64,000)</li>
<li>Amway Arena                 (33,100)</li>
<li>Amway Products           (40,500)</li>
<li>Amway.com                    (165,000)</li>
<li>Amway Center                (40,500)</li>
<li>Amway Scam                   (18,100)</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Amway-Scam-SERP-of-Google-Autosuggest.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-248" title="Amway Scam SERP of Google Autosuggest" src="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Amway-Scam-SERP-of-Google-Autosuggest.jpg" alt="Amway Scam SERP of Google Autosuggest" width="357" height="274" /></a></p>
<p>Even though the keyword phrase &#8216;amway scam&#8217; is at the bottom of the list, the Google algo rockets it to the 3rd position on their autosuggest feature and even in the natural search index. They do not determine this by actual search demand, they hide behind their secret sauce formula called relevance. Like Coca-Cola, Google will not reveal how they determine relevance, yet will little effort, a casual observer can see that negative words get a big boost in relavance from approximately 2 to 4 times more in comparison to actual search demand.</p>
<p>When sharing this discrepancy with other Google Gurus, they laugh at me when I try to make the case that this prejudged practice doesn&#8217;t help Google. They say, if the newpapers only printed positive news, then they&#8217;d go out of business. They lecture me saying Google is not really a &#8216;search&#8217; business, they are an &#8216;advertising&#8217; business model. Google is looking for rubberneckers who can&#8217;t drive by a minor accident on the freeway without making hundreds behind them slow down and take a look, thus allowing them time to spring their pay per click ads and other secret sales of search data to the corporate world as well as the hungry government intelligence services that are on an autopay relationship with Google.  The Google experts point to hundreds of articles showing how AT&amp;T and Google have seemlessly worked together to data farm all communication and searches in violation of the United States Constitution and turn it the info over to the Feds for a fee or favors.  If you think I&#8217;m fabricating this story, just Google:  &#8216;at&amp;t illegal wiretapping&#8217; or &#8216;google nsa&#8217;.  Even Google&#8217;s CEO, Eric Schmidt, questioned, &#8220;What do you have to hide&#8230;?&#8221;</p>
<p>Many authorities demonstrate that Fascism, where governments and corporations become &#8220;One&#8221; to dominate the little guy, is the driving force in geopolitics in Amercan and Global politics, but what do I know?</p>
<p>The bottom line is this:  if you want to beat your competition if they are doing a better job than you, take your authority site and couch your position so that you are not delivering libelous content by the letter of the law, yet you destroy the companies who produce a better product, for less money with passion.  That&#8217;s the Google Way.</p>
<g:plusone href="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/reputation-management/google-ranks-the-word-scam-high-in-seo-and-loses-lawsuit/"  size="tall"   ></g:plusone><div align="right" style="float: none; clear:left; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/reputation-management/google-ranks-the-word-scam-high-in-seo-and-loses-lawsuit/"></a></div><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glenwoodfin.com%2Freputation-management%2Fgoogle-ranks-the-word-scam-high-in-seo-and-loses-lawsuit%2F&amp;title=Google%20Ranks%20the%20Word%20%26%238216%3BScam%26%238217%3B%20High%20in%20SEO%20and%20Loses%20Lawsuit" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.glenwoodfin.com/reputation-management/google-ranks-the-word-scam-high-in-seo-and-loses-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is .Com the Best Domain Name Extension for Google Search Engine Ranking?</title>
		<link>http://www.glenwoodfin.com/seo/is-com-the-best-domain-name-extension-for-google-search-engine-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.glenwoodfin.com/seo/is-com-the-best-domain-name-extension-for-google-search-engine-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen Woodfin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brad fallon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number one on google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top level domain names]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glenwoodfin.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is .com the best domain name extension for Google ranking? Glen Woodfin, SEO specialist says yes and tells why.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left;  margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glenwoodfin.com%2Fseo%2Fis-com-the-best-domain-name-extension-for-google-search-engine-ranking%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glenwoodfin.com%2Fseo%2Fis-com-the-best-domain-name-extension-for-google-search-engine-ranking%2F&amp;source=glenwoodfin&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;service_api=9baa9432e09d5571799b2ae153bb6907&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div id="attachment_58" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-58" title="Best Domain Name Extensions" src="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Best-Domain-Name-Extensions-300x246.jpg" alt="What are the best domain name extensions?" width="300" height="246" /><p class="wp-caption-text">What are the best domain name extensions?</p></div>
<p>Is <strong>.com </strong>the best domain name extension for the highest Google ranking? The answer is yes from my experience.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I did an my casual empirical study mixed with a little of my own anecdotal evidence. Every time I publish a blog with a .com extension, it shows up on page one within a month or two if there are only 100,000 or less competing broad match sites in the search results. Often, a new .com site works its way to the first position on page one of a Google search if the exact keywords are in the domain name. I&#8217;m amazed that since the beginning of 2008, I&#8217;ve been enjoying this phenomenon. It sure does make optimizing my sites a lot easier. Usually, I don&#8217;t have to build more than about 5 appropriate back links to get in the top position on a Google for local businesses in a city of 500,000 or less.</p>
<p>What about the other domain name extensions like: .net, .org, .info, .biz, .me, .mobi, .tv, .us and .ws?  To test it, I published multiple blogs at the same time with all of the same domain name, meta tags, h1 titles and descriptions and the only two that were hot in the summer of 2009 were .com and .org. The others showed up on page 50 or deeper. I know that this isn&#8217;t a scientific test, but I have been witnessing this trend for at least 2 years. So, my preference would be .com, .org and then .net. The others, well good luck, you&#8217;ll need to get familiar with additional search engine optimization strategies if you use .info, .biz, .me, .mobi, .tv, .us or .ws. I do buy and use them, but I try to avoid them if possible because they are more of a challenge to rank well.</p>
<p>To galvanize my point, I have several blank websites at the number one spot on Google with nothing but an h1 tag and the meta tags. So, content isn&#8217;t as important as some preach even though SEO gurus often say, &#8220;Content is king&#8221;. I believe with the current Google algorithm, content is not king. <strong>Links</strong> absolutely beat content with Google. Great content does not get you to the top of the search engines, SEO does.</p>
<p><a title="brad fallon" href="http://www.seoradio.com/about-seo-radio/" target="_blank">Brad Fallon</a> of SEO Research, one of my most admired SEO experts, said on his famous &#8220;Stomping the Search Engines&#8221; SEO course, that it didn&#8217;t make any difference to Google which domain extension you used. &#8220;Stomping the Search Engines&#8221; is over 5 years old and I believe that it does make a difference today what your domain name extension you secure. I&#8217;ll bet Brad has seen a shift as well. I&#8217;d love to hear his latest thoughts on this as I respect his opinion on search.</p>
<p>On a similar issue, as I mentioned above, it is prudent to secure a domain name with your primary keyword phrase. That will give it a boost as well. So many go for branding, but I go with keywords in domain name whenever possible. If I have to go with branding on the main site domain name, then I&#8217;ll simultaneously promote a blog or another site with the primary keywords in the domain name, then point the traffic to the main branded website.</p>
<p>Most know that getting some age on your domain name and website helps in your rankings as well. If you purchased a domain name and you&#8217;re leaving it as a generic parked page at GoDaddy, then publish it with meta tags and at least an h1 title tag to start getting some age on the site. When you are ready to create the rest of your site, you&#8217;ll climb to the top even faster. I used to leave everything on Cash Parking at GoDaddy, but those sites have become a mere fraction of what they used to bring in revenue, so now I say, publish early and publish often, forget Cash Parked pages unless you are making a bundle.</p>
<p>Ranking of Domain Name Extensions:</p>
<p>1. .Com</p>
<p>2. .Org</p>
<p>3. .Net</p>
<p>4. .Us</p>
<p>5. .Me</p>
<p>6. .Biz</p>
<p>7. .Info</p>
<p>8. .Ws</p>
<p>9. .Mobi</p>
<p>The .co domain name extension came on in the last year and was marketed as the new .com. I tested it and it&#8217;s a dog. They were trying to sell it for a $30 premium, but don&#8217;t fall for the hype.</p>
<p>2011 is coming to an end, I&#8217;ve been finding the top 3 domain name extensions remain to only ones with an SEO boost. A domain name reseller tried to tell me that the new .co is the new .com, but after testing, it&#8217;s just a sales ploy because it kind of sounds like .com; it did not fare any better than .biz. The price was a whopping $28 with no added benefits. If you are grabbing all your domain name extensions to protect and control your name online, then I recommend buying it. I own all mine for that purpose.</p>
<p>What have your experiences been with domain name extensions and Google ranking? Please share them with us.</p>
<p>As of July of 2011. The .com, .org and the .net varieties remain the best top level domain name extensions for seo. I have seen no notable boost for all the others. GoDaddy.com sales people were pushing the .co extension as the new .com; however, after testing, it became clear it was a dog and simply a sales ploy to take advantage of the naivety of the public. Unfortunately, they were selling it off at a premium price (around $20 or $30 a year as I recall); sad, indeed.</p>
<p>For an authoritative discussion of top level domain name, one can go to the Wikipedia&#8217;s discussion of it at: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains</a>.</p>
<p>To rank in a foreign country, you should consider this discussion of International domain name extensions: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This post is still accurate as of December of 2011.</p>
<p>The .xxx domain name extensions are now on sale for about $99 a year at: <a href="http://bit.ly/xxx-domain-name-sale">http://bit.ly/xxx-domain-name-sale</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Off the wall: Who is the <a title="Coolest Guy on the Planet" href="http://www.coolestguyontheplanet.com" target="_blank">Coolest Guy on the Planet</a> in the SEO landscape?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<g:plusone href="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/seo/is-com-the-best-domain-name-extension-for-google-search-engine-ranking/"  size="tall"   ></g:plusone><div align="right" style="float: none; clear:left; padding: 5px 0px 0px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.glenwoodfin.com/seo/is-com-the-best-domain-name-extension-for-google-search-engine-ranking/"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.glenwoodfin.com/seo/is-com-the-best-domain-name-extension-for-google-search-engine-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>131</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

